Closing the gap between men’s and women’s sports

Disparity in sports coverage

Disparity in sports coverage | Graphic by Lena Yang

When Peter Baxter came to Wilfrid Laurier University in 1998, the institution was a football school.

Funds, time and dedication were put entirely to build the men’s football program. It wasn’t because the department of athletics and recreation weren’t trying; it was because football was where the money was.

But when Baxter was hired, he wanted to dedicate himself to the entire program — and all genders for excellence in sport.

“We needed to compete on other levels,” Baxter said. “We started off in those days to hire a full-time coach and athletic director, and [a women’s basketball coach] … and then we hired Peter Campbell, the men’s [basketball] coach because we wanted to compete in basketball.”

Why basketball? You could find interest in the community.

And then came hockey — both men’s and women’s teams began to evolve as Baxter continued building the Golden Hawk program. Changes to the facility were made because the women’s locker room was a third of the size of the men’s locker room, and resources weren’t the same.

“To me, they are just athletes. They are all student-athletes and they are all high-performance athletes, and I didn’t want to distinguish between a football athlete and a swimmer, or a female hockey player and a male hockey player,” Baxter said. “They are two different teams, but I want to make sure they are treated equitably through.”

Fast forward to today and the Laurier program has an equal amount of men’s and women’s varsity sports with seven teams each and four co-ed programs. But the level of performance, marketing, funding and outcomes can vary based on gender.

In its history, Laurier has 67 provincial championships and 13 national championships. Women’s teams have won seven of those 13 national banners. But in recent years, since Baxter joined, women have excelled past their male counterparts, claiming 32 provincial or national championships compared to 12 from men’s varsity teams.

“Part of the success of the women’s program is that our vision of the program is to make sure that, if we’re going to offer an excellent program, be it male or female, that we’re going to offer it at the highest level that we can,” Baxter said.

But funding continues to be skewed. According to the Canadian Interuniversity Sport athletic financial awards report, Laurier provided 287 student-athletes with an athletic scholarship. 57 per cent of those who received an award were male athletes, while 43 per cent of women athletes received scholarships.

Additionally, because of the size and money needed to run the program, football continues to be the largest portion of a varsity budget. Overall in the CIS, 1581 student-athletes participating in football received a scholarship, amounting to approximately $2,416,235 of the total $15,981,189 given to student-athletes at member institutions.

So what are the differences that the audience or marketers see in the women’s and men’s game that may make one favourable over the other?

Paul Falco, head coach of the women’s basketball team at Laurier, has coached both men’s and women’s basketball at the university level. He said he hasn’t found a huge difference in the coaching styles aside from men being bigger, faster and stronger. But in terms of style of play, both games are very similar.

To Falco, women catching up to their male counterparts is an irrelevant term.

“I don’t believe the women’s game is competing against the men’s game,” he said. “The women’s game is a solid product and there is currently a lot of interest in Canada around basketball … the future is bright for the sport in this country, for both the men’s and women’s game.”

Rick Osborne, head coach of the women’s hockey team since 2003, said a lot of it could do with the size and strength of the teams the audience are watching. The physicality of the game is different between men’s and women’s hockey — shots are harder and players are bigger in men’s hockey, which makes it hard to compare.

“The fans love the size, speed and physicality of the men’s game,” Osborne said. “A women’s game looks good from ice level when two good teams are playing, but from up top in a large venue, it can look slow because of the size.”

“There are fans of the women’s game, but smaller in quantity.”

Fans, and ergo interest, also come from media coverage. A study done by the University of Southern California in June 2015 found coverage of women’s sports has barely budged in a quarter-century in the United States despite dramatic increases in the number of women participating in different levels of sports. Los Angeles-based network affiliates devote only 3.2 per cent of airtime to women’s sports, down from five per cent in 1989. The same can be said about Canadian news.

“A very small percentage … a very solid, small percentage of any coverage is of women’s sport. It’s all male. Very male dominated,” Baxter said. “We need more coverage in women’s sport. We need an entire generation watching the sport, playing, building up to it.”

This challenge continues to be one of the main issues women’s teams deal with. The Silhouette, McMaster University’s student newspaper, critiqued their own coverage from Sept. 2014 to Feb. 5, 2015. They published 43 articles on men’s teams, 20 on women’s and seven on “mixed” or both genders.

Between May 2014 and April 2015, The Cord published 61 stories about men’s teams, 42 stories about women’s and nine stories including both genders.

“I think one of the challenges we’ve had, even in the the entire university sport [community] is getting university sport out there,” Baxter said.

“It’s the best kept secret of entertainment … We’ve got to do our part to engage, but there’s got to be just as much coverage on it.”

Osborne feels there is “great support” at Laurier for student-athletes and administration and coaches feel good about that.

But from a coach’s perspective, the support needs to be leveraged with a focus on student-athlete performance as well.

Baxter, Falco and Osborne agreed Laurier has the ability to produce “world class athletes,” but it needs the resources for both men and women to continue to grow.

“World class athletes and successful teams will have no trouble adding value to the department and the university and that is how we ‘catch up’ and stay relative, especially in challenging budget times,” Osborne said.

And above all, it’s important for Laurier to maintain a competitive level for its women’s teams.

“The main thing is that we can compete,” Baxter said.

-With files from Killian Cuppage and Drew Yates

2 Comments

  1. I think this article is talking about a problem that doesn’t exist. There is more coverage of men’s teams because that’s where the money and a large number of fans are.

    And comparing the number of articles written about both genders is also misleading. It misses two important variables. First, news articles are published specifically because they inform the public. If one team has more news to write about, why is that a crime? Let’s say there are 9 stories about a men’s football team, and 9 about a woman’s football team. And let’s say the men’s quarterback breaks his arm. Should that not be reported because we don’t want there to be an unequal number of articles? Of course not. If it’s news, it’s news. We shouldn’t look at it through a gender lens.

    Second, the following is larger for men’s sports generally, so for news outlets to make money, they need to cover what’s most interesting to readers. If it changes and women start attracting a larger audience, then the number of articles would shift accordingly.

    This really is a non-issue. Let the marketplace dictate what people are interested in, especially when it’s a topic of such little societal importance like sports.

  2. Women don’t get laid for being athletes, men do.
    Women are attracted to ‘quality’ men not looks. In highschool, quality, popularity and sports are tied together.
    The incentives are set up differently.
    Everything ultimately leads to reproduction.
    Disproportionate number of female athletes are lesbian (4% would be norm)
    Straight males make up a higher number than gay.
    come down to evolution. But evolution was never politically correct.

Leave a Reply