Statues are not truly evil

/

Rebutting the arguments of those who oppose the statue project

Rebutting the arguments of those who oppose the statue project | Photo by Kamil Ahmed

Over the past four months, students at Wilfrid Laurier University have endured endless amounts of slander regarding the planned statue project.

For those of you who donโ€™t know about it, the project would involve the installment of numerous statues of past prime ministers across the Waterloo campus.

What frustrates me is that those who are against this project donโ€™t have arguments based on reasoned, philosophical difference, but instead, based on an anti-intellectual motive, aimed at stopping any mention of history that may be considered โ€œoffensive.โ€

This isnโ€™t a group of every day students suddenly enraged at this project. Itโ€™s the same tired, cranky, social justice types that feel they are morally entitled to run Laurier.

Allow me to elaborate on some of the opposing arguments out there.

Apparently, it is considered offensive that all of our prime ministers have been white. Some of these prime ministers were openly anti-Native, which could offend students who have Native backgrounds.

The statues would be built on what is considered โ€œnative land,โ€ which is seen as insensitive.

Now this is a lot to unpack, but itโ€™s time to poke holes in their logic.

Itโ€™s true that our prime ministers have been white, but thatโ€™s a fact of Canada. Itโ€™s not a conspiracy to paint our past leaders with one brush. So while facts of Canadian history may harm the poor sensitivities of some students, university is a place where people come to learn.

But whatโ€™s more unbelievable is the idea that these statues would be built on Native land. These statues would be placed on the campus of a university named after, in case anyone is unaware, Wilfrid Laurier – a former white PM. Using the logic of the protesters, the very existence of our university here is a scandalous offence.

It begs the question, if these students are so offended, why are they paying to come to a school on what they consider stolen land?

Itโ€™s so hypocritical that I question if Native students are actually being listened to or if those in opposition to the project are just using First Nations students as a smokescreen to hide their true intentions.

Whatโ€˜s even more sad is that this opposition started from a professor, Jonathan Finn. Itโ€™s hard to wrap my head around the idea that someone committed to teaching is also interested in making sure certain facts about our history are suppressed.

But whatโ€™s more unbelievable is the idea that these statues would be built on Native land. These statues would be placed on the campus of a university named after, in case anyone is unaware, Wilfrid Laurier – a former white PM. Using the logic of the protesters, the very existence of our university here is a scandalous offence.

What we have is a case of people pretending they have a right to be offended.

The truth is, thatโ€™s not a right. If I get offended, that doesnโ€™t allow me to stop everything I disagree with.

Initially, the complaint was that the price tag would be too large considering the layoffs last year, but once it emerged the statues would be free and the installation insignificant, the protesters tried to save face by saying itโ€™s offensive.

Itโ€™s even more telling that those opposed to this project are the same cast of ghastly characters who objected to the layoffs last year.

This isnโ€™t a group of every day students suddenly enraged at this project. Itโ€™s the same tired, cranky, social justice types that feel they are morally entitled to run Laurier.

Every time thereโ€™s a controversy here, itโ€™s the same group making the same claims, crying wolf that every action taken by Max Blouw is some weird microaggression aimed at harming students. Donโ€™t let these thin-skinned students bully everyone into submission.

Itโ€™s important to remember that discussion is the number one priority for these types of situations. This project opens up dialogue between students about the good and the bad actions of past leaders.

Thatโ€™s a creative way to teach students about Canadian history.

Please go to Change.org and sign the petition to continue the statue project.


One response to “Statues are not truly evil”

  1. Ryan Orr Avatar

    So, you assert here that “discussion is the number one priority for these types of situations”, immediately after you condemn the anti-statue faction for voicing their opinion in what I would call a discussion. Students and faculty who are against the statue project have started this discussion by presenting their views, which you claim are simply offended for the sake of being offended. (I assure you, that is not why we/they are offended). The logic in that argument is baffling, truly. Additionally, the language used in this piece is unnecessarily rude and condescending – how on earth does being concerned that someone has lost their job make me a “ghastly character”? Overall, it seems that you feel personally offended that someone is offended about something, even though don’t understand why they are offended. Rather than insulting students and professors (namely Dr Finn, who is in no way trying to “cover up” history) using flawed logic, please present a rational case for supporting the statue project that extends beyond “don’t be so PC, guys!”.

Leave a Reply

Serving the Waterloo campus, The Cord seeks to provide students with relevant, up to date stories. Weโ€™re always interested in having more volunteer writers, photographers and graphic designers.