
Last Friday, Eran Feitelson, a professor of geography from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, gave a lectureย entitled โThe Options and Impediments to the Israeli-Palestinian Water Disputeโ atย Wilfrid Laurier University.
The topics discussed ranged from the geography of water in the Middle East to the issues of water storage and joint-management between Israel and Palestine.
โMost of the projects that we talk about are joint Israeli-Palestinian projects,โ said Feitelson.
โIn terms of the basic disputeโฆ most of Israelโs water is derived from shared resources, the mountain aquifer [and] the Jordan River.โ
Israelโs National Water Carrier, completed in 1964, connected all surface water basins from the Sea of Galilee in the northeast to the metropolitan areas in the coastal plains.
โBut the main water source of the region is the groundwater,โ explained Feitelson.
The groundwater is mostly located in mountain aquifers within Palestine as the geography of the Jordan Rift Valley causes water to naturally flow from tributaries around the Eastern Lebanon Mountain Range into a series of springs underneath the Samarian and Judean Highlands.
Feitelson stated that in the case of the Middle East, with long periods of drought, โstorage is the name of the game.โ
Groundwater is particularly useful in this sense because it is not vulnerable to evaporation, and can be used to increase storage capacity.
Israel also uses industrial processes such as desalination and recycling of wastewater to increase the amount of the water supply that is โinsensitive to climate and weather.โ
However, given the location of storage resources Feitelson recognized that Israel and Palestine will need to manage the shared aquifers.
โThe discussion usually begins as some zero-sum game, a view which essentially says where one side gets more, the other side gets less,โ explained Feitelson.
โThere is a limited resource and all the [political] entities โ Israel, Palestine, Jordan โ are in extreme water scarcity.โ
Feitelson also pointed to the issues of rapid population growth in the region and the corresponding increase in per capita demand to follow in the economic future.
โHowever, the zero-sum game is actually outdated,โ he claimed.
He proposed that the debate would be better handled if parties would โcease to talk about historical rightsโ and look at the issue in the economic realm to โde-politicize the issue.โ
Israelโs industrial water system is used to transport desalinated seawater from the coast inland, but despite increasing overall water supply, so that the zero-sum game becomes more flexible, the level of distrust between the parties limits the possibility of cooperation.
โThe Palestinian Water Authority recognizes that at some point in the future there will be a need for desalination but [doesnโt] want to be dependent on [it],โ stated Feitelson.
Instead, according to Feitelson, it would exercise a higher degree of sovereignty over the pumping of the mountain aquifer resources, of which the per capita use amongst Israelis is disproportionately more than that amongst Palestinians.
โDesalination is part of the solution but is not the whole solution,โ concluded Feitelson.
He finished by explaining that basic power relationships are intrinsically changed between both parties with Israel being upstream and in control of the water sources.
Ultimately he argued that the question of โwho will control the storageโ must be answered through joint water management.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.