Last week, Macleans released an issue with a cover story entitled โThe Most Corrupt Province in Canadaโ, arguing that Quรฉbec has a unique political culture that fosters government patronage and corruption. Even more controversial was the picture on the magazineโs cover with a cherished symbol of Quรฉbec, Bonhomme, holding a suitcase stuffed with cash.
The article outlines a history of Quรฉbec corruption starting with Maurice
Duplessis and the Union Nationale to the current scandal that is engulfing Premier Jean Charest involving illegal contributions from certain industries in Quรฉbec and bagman vetting judicial appointments.
The reality is the truth hurts. Throughout Quรฉbecโs history there has been a unique abuse of political power and excessive patronage. It is a fair criticism that Macleans did not take into account the corruption that takes place in other provinces. It is not fair to say, however, this is an instance of โQuรฉbec bashingโ. Macleans did not in any way suggest that corruption is endemic of the people of Quรฉbec, but instead placed the blame on their leaders and politicians.
It is absolutely absurd that Premier Jean Charest would attack Macleans for their criticism. It is also ridiculous that Members of Parliament would censure the magazine in an attempt to score cheap political points in Quรฉbec. Those in glass houses should not throw stones.
Thankfully Quรฉbecers do not seem to share the views of the political establishment. Almost two-thirds believe corruption is systematic and widespread in the province. Instead of going through the daily ritual of political posturing, politicians should work to correct problems of corruption in Quรฉbec politics. Quรฉbecers deserve better.